evidoria

What works in St Peter Port

All catalogues · Guernsey profile

3
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Weaknesses

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Scalability -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Innovation level -25 pts 37 here · 62 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -47 pts 0 here · 47 average

Equity & inclusion -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Scalability
50 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured results
33 · 57
Innovation level
37 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 47
Equity & inclusion
0 · 50

Coloured bar: St Peter Port. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Guernsey's WCAG 2.1 AA Standard for Government and Disability-Sector Digital Services · 88

Digital Greenhouse: Guernsey's State-Funded Innovation Hub, Its 2024 Reach and Its 2026 Closure Review · 48

Guernsey's Digital Innovators Programme — Post-16 AI Education with UCL · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more